Summer 2016 issue of Dædalus: “On Political Leadership”
Essays offer insight into the character and quality of political authority, as explored by a multinational and multidisciplinary group of authors
|President Barack Obama meets with Eurozone leaders during the G8 Summit at Camp David (Photograph by Chief Official White House Photographer Pete Souza)
“The yearning for a strong individual leader who will dominate all and sundry is the pursuit of a false god,” argues Archie Brown (University of Oxford), guest editor of the Summer 2016 issue of Dædalus. Since no leader in a democracy was ever elected because he or she was believed to have a monopoly of wisdom, it defies both common sense and democratic values for other members of the leadership team to subordinate their independent judgment to the perceived preferences of the top leader. “Wise decisions,” Brown writes in his essay, “Against the Führerprinzip,” are “less likely to be forthcoming when one person can predetermine the outcome of a meeting or foreclose the discussion by pulling rank.” Yet, notwithstanding ghastly experience with overweening leaders in many different countries, the craving for a “strong leader” still persists, and is a major factor in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
“On Political Leadership,” the American Academy’s latest issue of Dædalus, is now available for order through MIT Press. Learn more about this issue in the Table of Contents immediately below.
For more information about past issues of Dædalus, please click here.
(For Academy members: In addition to receiving a printed copy of each issue of Dædalus, you may access electronic versions of Dædalus by logging into the Academy’s website.)
Table of Contents
Introduction by Archie Brown (University of Oxford)
This opening essay introduces the major questions the contributors will explore: What is effective political leadership? Do we need “strong” individual leadership, or do we need to be protected from it? And what forms of leadership have best promoted democratic values: in the United States, in post-Soviet Eurasia, and following the Arab Spring?
Leadership, Equality & Democracy by Nannerl O. Keohane (Princeton University)
Democracy is rooted in the idea of political equality, but wealth inevitably dictates that some citizens are “more equal” than others. Thus, profound and worsening socioeconomic inequalities pose a fundamental threat to Western democratic governance. In this essay, Nannerl Keohane argues that only passionate and pragmatic leadership—found with presidents and heads of government but also with congressional committees, local politics, and education—can overcome the dangers of a polity in which the power of money so exceeds the will of the people as effectively to veto social change.
Rethinking the Psychology of Leadership: From Personal Identity to Social Identity by S. Alexander Haslam (University of Queensland) & Stephen D. Reicher (University of St. Andrews)
Effective leadership is the capacity to mobilize a mass constituency to bring about shared goals. But the same qualities that make one leader effective may render another useless. Using a social identity approach, psychologists S. Alexander Haslam and Stephen D. Reicher explore leadership as an influence process built on an internalized sense of group membership shared between leaders and followers. Successful leaders not only represent and mirror their followers, but actively create, advance, and embed this identity in pursuit of their goals.
Presidential Leadership & the Separation of Powers by Eric A. Posner (University of Chicago)
The U.S. presidents judged the “greatest” leaders by historians and pundits are also the most heavily criticized by legal scholars. These presidents overcame the barriers erected by Madison’s separation of powers and breached the constitutional norms they swore to uphold. What then stops presidents from abusing their powers? Eric Posner points to the multifaceted nature of presidential leadership: the president is at once leader of the country, a party, and the executive branch. The conflicts between these interests constrain his or her power.
Women & Legislative Leadership in the U.S. Congress: Representing Women’s Interests in Partisan Times by Michele L. Swers (Georgetown University)
Women are drastically underrepresented in American political institutions. This has prompted speculation about the impact of electing more women on policy and the functioning of government. Examining the growing presence of women in Congress, Michele Swers demonstrates that women exhibit unique policy priorities, focusing more on the needs of various groups of women. However, the incentive structure of the American electoral system, which rewards ideological purity, means that women are not likely to bring more consensus to Washington.
Varieties of Presidentialism and of the Leadership Outcomes by Robert Elgie (Dublin City University)
What is the relationship between institutional power and political leadership? What is the effect of presidential institutions on political, economic, and social outcomes? Robert Elgie examines the protracted debate among political scientists about whether a parliamentary or presidential system is more conducive to the transition to democracy, and argues that any approach to studying institutional power must account for the quality and style of specific political leaderships and the interactions between institutions, leaders, and contexts.
Authoritarian Leadership in the Post-Communist World by Eugene Huskey (Stetson University)
Several of the successor states to the Soviet Union have seen the emergence of monstrous cults of personality; in a number of cases, their presidents wield even more individual power than that of party leaders in the post-Stalin Soviet era. Eugene Huskey explores the origins and development of personalistic rule in these states, finding significant variation among the approaches leaders have used to consolidate power and outline a post-Soviet future.
Leadership—It’s a System, Not a Person! by Barbara Kellerman (Harvard Kennedy School)
Highlighting the absurdity of what she calls the “leadership industry,” Barbara Kellerman suggests that “we do not have much better an idea of how to grow good leaders, or of how to stop or at least slow bad leaders, than we did one hundred or even one thousand years ago.” Kellerman questions the overwhelming importance of individual leaders to begin with, looking instead to contexts and followers, and calls for the replacement of the lucrative but vapid industry surrounding leadership training and education.
Multiple but Complementary, Not Conflictual, Leaderships” The Tunisian Democratic Transition in Comparative Perspective by Alfred Stepan (Columbia University)
While democracy has spectacularly failed to take root in Egypt, Syria, and Libya, an impressive but still fragile democracy has emerged in post-Arab Spring Tunisia. Alfred Stepan notes a commonality with the transitions that produced effective democratic leadership in Indonesia, Spain, and Chile; like those nations, Tunisia has had a multiplicity of cooperating leaders, rather than a single “strong leader” or multiple conflictual leaderships. This case study outlines key features of the Tunisian transition.
Against the Führerprinzip: For Collective Leadership by Archie Brown (University of Oxford)
In his essay, Archie Brown highlights the ineffectiveness and dangerousness of powerful individual leaders. He argues that since no leader in a democracy was ever elected because he or she was believed to have a monopoly of wisdom, it defies both common sense and democratic values for other members of the leadership team to subordinate their independent judgment to the perceived preferences of the person at the top.
In Favor of ‘Leader Proofing’ by Anthony King (University of Essex)
Strong leaders are by definition high-risk individuals likely to do more harm than good; the best-governed liberal democracies have actually obviated the need for them. Anthony King concludes the issue by arguing that while there may be crises necessitating the acquisition and wielding of power by a single leader, there is much to be said for a liberal democracy’s “political culture and institutions having built into them a fair amount of ‘leader proofing.’”
Order your copy of the Summer 2016 Dædalus “On Political Leadership” today.
Dædalus was founded in 1955 as the Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. It draws on the enormous intellectual capacity of the Academy, whose members are among the world’s most prominent thinkers in the sciences, humanities, arts, and social sciences, as well as the full range of professions and public life.
Each quarterly issue contains multidisciplinary, authoritative essays on a topic; recent themes have included judicial independence, the global nuclear future, mass incarceration, the alternative energy future, the modern American military, race and inequality, and the future of the Internet. Often, issues are tied to current Academy projects, highlighting findings and recommendations from Academy research.
Subscribers to Dædalus include Academy members as well as research institutes, libraries, and other individuals. Both print and electronic subscriptions are available from MIT Press; recent issues are also available on Kindle.