Academic Freedom



This project focuses on calls for intellectual diversity and the challenges such demands pose to traditional notions of academic freedom. Legislation has been proposed in Congress, and in at least 24 states, that seeks to promote “intellectual diversity” by requiring colleges and universities to maintain a balance between faculty who are politically conservative and politically liberal.

In 2006, the Academy convened a small study group of scholars and administrators to: (1) gather and analyze various reports and background studies on “intellectual diversity”; and (2) draft and solicit comments from the higher education community on a statement that reaffirms the basic principles of academic freedom. The study group drafted a Statement on Academic Freedom, which holds that faculty members should be judged on the professional merit of their work and not on their political affiliation or outlook. Click here to read the full Statement on Academic Freedom.

The study group anticipates that adoption of the statement by academic institutions, professional associations, and learned societies will help to counter legislative initiatives that threaten to undermine academic freedom on campus. It also hopes that the statement will support leaders in higher education who are willing to speak out to their boards, faculty, students and alumni when academic freedom is threatened.

The project is co-chaired by Jonathan R. Cole (Columbia University), Robert C. Post (Yale Law School), and Geoffrey R. Stone (University of Chicago). Additional members of the Academic Freedom Study Group include: Robert M. Berdahl (formerly, Association of American Universities), Nancy E. Cantor (Syracuse University and American Council on Education), Larry D. Kramer (William and Flora Hewlett Foundation), and Pauline Yu (American Council of Learned Societies).



Project Leaders