An open access publication of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
Spring 2007

Why bother? The evolutionary genetics of sex

Author
Brian Charlesworth

Brian Charlesworth, a Foreign Honorary Member of the American Academy since 1996, is Royal Society Research Professor at the University of Edinburgh. He is the author of “Evolution in Age-Structured Populations” (1980) and coauthor of “Evolution: A Very Short Introduction” (2003) in addition to numerous journal articles. His recent research focuses on molecular evolution and variation, the evolution of genetic and sexual systems, and the quantitative genetics of life-history traits.

It is an astonishing finding–derived from more than a century of painstaking research into the cellular basis of reproduction in a huge variety of organisms– that sex is the most prevalent mode of reproduction among the great division of life (the eukaryotes), which includes animals, green plants, algae, fungi, and protozoa.1

To geneticists, sexual reproduction is the formation of a new individual from a cell (zygote) produced by the union of two different cells (gametes). In the case of animals, the gametes are an egg and a sperm. When the resulting individual reproduces, its gametes contain a patchwork of genetic information derived from each of the two gametes that generated it (a process called recombination). Recombination happens regardless of whether the zygote divides to form many separate single-celled individuals (as in simple organisms, like yeast), or whether the daughter cells remain associated to produce a complex multicellular organism, like an oak tree or a person. In contrast, with asexual reproduction, a single parent produces offspring that are usually exact genetic replicates of itself.

We have good grounds for believing that regular sexual reproduction evolved very early in the history of the eukaryotes, and that most instances of asexual reproduction among them are the result of subsequent evolution. All mammals and all birds reproduce sexually, but only a few dozen species of reptiles, amphibia, and fish reproduce asexually.2  Similarly, only about 0.1 percent of the over three hundred thousand species of flowering plants are thought to reproduce asexually.3

.  .  .

Endnotes

  • 1I thank Deborah Charlesworth for her comments on the manuscript. J. Maynard Smith, The Evolution of Sex (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978); G. Bell, The Masterpiece of Nature (London: Croom-Helm, 1982). A regular cycle of sexual reproduction is absent from the other division of life (prokaryotes), which encompasses bacteria and viruses. There are, however, often detectable exchanges of pieces of genetic information between individuals within prokaryote populations, involving a variety of processes that act as a substitute for sex. See J. Maynard Smith, N. H. Smith, M. O’Rourke, and B. G. Spratt, “How Clonal are Bacteria?” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 90 (1993): 4384–4388.
  • 2Maynard Smith, The Evolution of Sex; Bell, The Masterpiece of Nature.
  • 3A. M. Koltunow, “Apomixis–Molecular Strategies for the Generation of Genetically Identical Seeds Without Fertilization,” Plant Physiology 108 (1995): 1345–1352.
To read this essay or subscribe to Dædalus, visit the Dædalus access page
Access now